Skip to Main Content

Academic Integrity and Avoiding Plagiarism

Learn more about the Academic Integrity Code, avoiding plagiarism, and scholarly communication.

Scholarship as Conversation

 

"Instead of seeking discrete answers to complex problems, experts understand that a given issue may be characterized by several competing perspectives as part of an ongoing conversation in which information users and creators come together and negotiate meaning... New forms of scholarly and research conversations provide more avenues in which a wide variety of individuals may have a voice in the conversation. Providing attribution to relevant previous research is also an obligation of participation in the conversation. It enables the conversation to move forward and strengthens one’s voice in the conversation."

From the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy/ Scholarship as a conversation

Additional Resources

Scholarship as Conversation

(This graphic depicts the three main aspects of Scholarly Conversation as a bulleted list undernearth an image of 4 students sitting at a table. Underneath the listed bullets is a roadmap showing how Scholarly Communication works in practice.)

Communities of scholars, researchers, or professionals engage in sustained discourse

  • ideas are formulated, debated, and weighed against one another over extended periods of time
  • some topics have established answers through this process, a query may not have a single uncontested answer
  • new forms of scholarly and research conversations provide more avenues in which a wide variety of individuals may have a voice in the conversation.

In Practice

First:  Cite the contributing work of others in your own information production

Then:  Contribute to scholarly conversation at an appropriate level

Finally:  Critically evaluate contributions made by others in participatory information environments

 

Infographic author:  Cynthia Tysick

Infographic license:  CC-BY-NC-SA

Image credit:  http://l.onionstatic.com/onion/2801/5/16x9/700.jpg